The UK Video Nasty Era: A Collector's Guide to Controversial Cinema

The early 1980s in the United Kingdom was a tumultuous time for horror and exploitation film enthusiasts. The era, now infamously known as the 'video nasty' era, saw the birth of a cultural phenomenon that not only shaped the UK's film censorship policies but also laid the groundwork for a unique subculture among movie collectors. Let's delve deeper into what made films 'video nasties,' the notorious Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) list, the titles that faced prosecution, and why these films remain highly coveted by collectors today.

What Made Films 'Video Nasties'?

The term 'video nasty' originated from the public and media hysteria that surrounded certain horror and exploitation films released on home video in the early 1980s. During this period, the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) did not yet regulate home video releases, leading to a flood of unregulated videotapes hitting the market. Critics and moral campaigners argued that these films contained graphic violence, sexual content, and disturbing imagery that were unsuitable for the public, especially children.

Films labeled as 'video nasties' often included extreme horror, gore, and taboo subjects that pushed the boundaries of good taste and decency. The notorious nature of these films was amplified by sensationalist media campaigns and the efforts of conservative groups, which argued that these movies were corrupting the minds of the youth. The uproar led to calls for stricter censorship and regulation of home video content.

The Role of Media and Public Perception

The media played a crucial role in shaping the public perception of video nasties. Sensational headlines and exaggerated claims about the effects of these films on viewers, especially children, fueled moral panic. Newspapers and television programs would often run features on the supposed dangers of these films, sometimes even without having seen them. This led to a widespread belief that video nasties were a direct threat to societal norms and the moral fabric of the nation.

The hysteria reached a point where some local councils began to take matters into their own hands, creating lists of banned films and instructing local video retailers to remove them from their shelves. This environment of fear and censorship ironically contributed to the allure and cult status of these films.

The DPP List: A Controversial Catalog

In response to public concern and media outrage, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) compiled a list of films that were deemed too obscene under the Obscene Publications Act of 1959. This list, which became known as the DPP list, featured 72 films that were considered prosecutable due to their content.

The criteria for inclusion on the DPP list were vague and often arbitrary, leading to a broad range of films being labeled as video nasties. Some of these films were notorious for their explicit content, while others were included due to their provocative titles or misleading cover art. The list included titles such as "Cannibal Holocaust," "The Evil Dead," and "I Spit on Your Grave," among others.

The Impact of the DPP List

The creation of the DPP list had a significant impact on the film industry and sparked debates on censorship and freedom of expression. Filmmakers and distributors were faced with the challenge of navigating these new regulations, often leading to self-censorship or alteration of content to avoid prosecution.

Moreover, the DPP list became a cultural artifact in its own right, symbolizing the era's clash between artistic freedom and censorship. The list's notoriety only heightened the public's curiosity about these films, inadvertently increasing their appeal and leading to a black market for banned videos.

Titles That Faced Prosecution

Out of the 72 films on the DPP list, 39 were successfully prosecuted, resulting in their removal from video store shelves and the possibility of heavy fines or imprisonment for those caught distributing them. The prosecutions were based on the films being deemed obscene and likely to deprave or corrupt viewers.

Some of the most infamous prosecuted titles included:

• "Cannibal Holocaust" (1980): Known for its extreme depictions of violence and alleged animal cruelty, this film became a prime target for censorship. Its director, Ruggero Deodato, was even brought to court to prove that no actors were harmed during the making of the film.
• "The Driller Killer" (1979): A gritty slasher film that drew attention for its graphic murder scenes and controversial marketing. The film's cover art, depicting a man being drilled in the forehead, was particularly provocative.
• "I Spit on Your Grave" (1978): A film that sparked outrage for its explicit depictions of sexual violence and revenge. Despite its controversial content, the film was defended by some as a feminist statement against misogyny.

These films, among others, became symbols of the video nasty era, representing the clash between artistic expression and censorship. They also highlighted the subjective nature of what was deemed obscene, as many of these films would later be released uncut in other countries or even in the UK itself, under revised guidelines.

Why Collectors Covet Video Nasties Today

Despite—or perhaps because of—the controversy surrounding them, video nasties have become prized possessions among physical media collectors. Here are a few reasons why these titles are highly sought after today:

Nostalgia and Cultural Significance

For many collectors, video nasties represent a unique period in film history. The era's controversy and the subsequent crackdown on certain films created an allure of rebellion and subversion that resonates with fans of cult and exploitation cinema. Owning a piece of this history is akin to possessing a relic of a bygone era, a time when films challenged social norms and censorship laws.

Furthermore, these films are often reflective of the social and political climate of the time, offering insights into the fears and anxieties of the era. For historians and enthusiasts alike, video nasties are more than just entertainment; they are windows into the past.

Rarity and Exclusivity

Many of the original video nasty releases were pulled from shelves and destroyed, making surviving copies rare and valuable. Collectors often seek first editions of these films, complete with the original artwork and packaging that contributed to their infamy. The rarity of these items adds to their desirability, especially among collectors who appreciate the history and controversy that surround them.

Original VHS tapes, in particular, have become highly sought after. The distinct artwork and often lurid box designs are considered iconic, and a complete collection of original video nasties is a significant achievement for any serious collector.

The Thrill of the Hunt

For collectors, part of the excitement lies in the hunt for these elusive titles. Scouring flea markets, online marketplaces, and collector conventions in search of a specific video nasty can be an exhilarating experience. The thrill of finding a rare title or a coveted edition is part of the allure that keeps collectors engaged and passionate about their hobby.

The community aspect of collecting also plays a role. Enthusiasts often share tips, trade films, and discuss their latest finds, creating a network of like-minded individuals who share a passion for this unique slice of cinematic history.

The Evolution of Cult Cinema

Video nasties have played a significant role in shaping the landscape of cult cinema. The films on the DPP list have influenced countless filmmakers and continue to be referenced in modern horror and exploitation movies. Collecting these films allows enthusiasts to explore the roots of the genre and appreciate the evolution of cult cinema over the decades.

Moreover, many of these films have been reassessed critically over time. What was once considered gratuitous or offensive is now often seen as innovative or groundbreaking, reflecting shifts in cultural attitudes towards film content and censorship.

Conclusion

The UK video nasty era remains a fascinating chapter in film history, marked by controversy, censorship, and cultural impact. While these films were once vilified and prosecuted, they now hold a special place in the hearts of collectors who appreciate their historical significance and cultural influence. The allure of video nasties continues to captivate collectors, ensuring that these notorious films will remain a cherished part of cinema's rich and diverse legacy.

The legacy of the video nasty era is a testament to the enduring power of film as a medium for challenging societal norms and provoking discussion. As cultural artifacts, these films offer valuable lessons on the consequences of censorship and the importance of artistic freedom. For collectors and cinephiles alike, the stories behind these films are as compelling as the content itself, ensuring their place in the annals of film history.